Editorial Policies

Plagiarism: In academia, plagiarism is considered academic misconduct and a major ethical concern. Plagiarism is deliberately using someone else’s intellectual property or data as one’s own without acknowledgement, such as citing the sources of the data (East 2010). Often, it is viewed as “a form of intellectual theft” (Ashworth et al. 1997, p. 200). Another category of plagiarism is self-plagiarism, which is when the author publishes his own idea, data, and text in different journals when no need for such duplication exists. ANJS uses all means to detect plagiarism. As a matter of quality assurance, a similarity of more than 20% in the text of a manuscript will be returned to the author to remove the similarities and reduce the chance of plagiarism.   

Citation: Authors must cite relevant articles and literature in their manuscript. Inappropriate citation or citation manipulation (such as excessive self-citation and prearranged mutual citation among researchers) are considered a form of misconduct.

Retraction of articles: Retraction of an article is considered if  major error in the article is reported and verified after careful investigation. These error include falsification of data, miscalculations, deliberate omission or sale of authorship, compromised peer-review and breach of issues related publishing agreement. ANJS follows COPE guidelines regarding this issue.   

Post-publication corrections: Correction of already-published articles in ANJS is permitted after careful consideration by the section editor. The necessary corrections are published under the title “Correction Notice” and are linked to the original articles. The corrections aim to correct  errors or provide additional information that may affect the interpretation of the work published. Editors of the ANJS shall be guided by the COPE guidelines of post-publication critiques.  

Article Removal: In rare cases an already published article may be removed. Article removal is issued in the following cases: inclusion of harmful data, violation of rights of participants, infringement of legal rights and court order.

In line with the publication ethics approved by COPE, the ANJS disapproves of all unethical practices such as plagiarism, fabrication, duplication, data manipulation/falsification, and efforts to influence the review process (such as gifting authorship, inappropriate acknowledgements, and references).